Naučna istraživanja

Final judgments of international and national judicial authorities for genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina:

 

Final judgments of international and national judicial authorities for genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina:

 

1.The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY): The Cases Radoslav Krstic in 2004, Convicted of aiding and abetting genocide in Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

2.The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, The Cases Milorad Trbic in 2011,  accused guilty of genocide in Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

3.The German Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court), Nikola Jorgic, in 1999, accused guilty of genocide in Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

4.The German Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court), Maksim Sokolovic, in 2001, accused guilty of genocide in Osmaci, Kalesija, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

5.The Bavarian appeals court in Germany, Novisalv Djajic, in 1997,  although there was no sufficient evidence that Novislav Djajic had “intent” to commit genocide, Judge Ermin Briessmann recalled that the court established, beyond reasonable doubt, that Serb forces committed genocide in Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1992.

 

6. The International Court of Justice ICJ presented its judgment on 26 February 2007, in which, among other things, it confirmed the ICTY judgment that the Srebrenica massacre was genocide, stating: The Court concludes that the acts committed at Srebrenica falling within Article II (a) and (b) of the Convention were committed with the specific intent to destroy in part the group of the Muslims of Bosnia and Herzegovina as such; and accordingly that these were acts of genocide, committed by members of the VRS in and around Srebrenica from about 13 July 1995. The Court found - although not unanimously - that Serbia was neither directly responsible for Srebrenica genocide, nor that it was complicit in it, but it did rule that Serbia had committed the breach the Genocide Convention by failing to prevent the Srebrenica genocide, for not cooperating with the ICTY in punishing the perpetrators of the genocide, in particular in respect of General Ratko Mladić, and for violating its obligation to comply with the provisional measures ordered by the Court. Vice-President of the Court dissented on the grounds that "Serbia’s involvement, as a principal actor or accomplice, in the genocide that took place in Srebrenica is supported by massive and compelling evidence."

 

Instance  judgments of international and national judicial authorities for genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina:

 

7.The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY): The Cases: Vujadin Popovic, Ljubisa Beara, Drago Nikolic in 2010, accused guilty of genocide in Srebrenica, subject to appeal

 



Pravosnažne presude međunarodnih i nacionalnih sudskih tijela za genocid u Bosni i Hercegovini:

1. Međunarodni krivični tribunal za područije bivše Jugoslavije: Radislav Krstić iz 2004. za geonocid u Srebrenicu.

2. Sud Bosne I Hercegovine: Milorad Trbić iz 2011. za genocid u Srebrenicu.

3. Savezni Vrhovni sud Njemačke: Nikola Jorgić iz 1999. za genocid u Doboju.

4. Savezni Vrhovni sud Njemačke: Maksim Sokolović iz 2001. za genocid u Osmaci – Kalesija.

5. Bavarski žalbeni sud u Njemačkoj: Novislav Đajić iz 1997. (za Foču). Ovdje je sud oslobodio Đajića optužbi za genocid ali je utvrdio da je zločin genocida kao takav počinjen u Foči.

6. Međunarodni sud pravde UN: Tužba Bosne i Hercegovine protiv Srbije za genocid: presuda iz 2007. utvrdila da je Srbija prekršila čl. 1. i čl. 4. UN Konvencije o genocidu iz 1948. (kršenje obaveze sprečavanja genocida i kršenje obaveze nekašnjavanja počinitelja genocida u BiH).


Nepravosnažna presuda Međunarodni krivični tribunal za područije bivše Jugoslavije

1. Međunarodni krivični tribunal za područije bivše Jugoslavije, Vujadin Popović, Ljubiša Beara, Drago Nikolić iz 2010. za genocid u Srebrenici - predmet u žalbenom postupku.

Vijesti: